Hong Kong may ‘improve’ security laws after top court agrees Tiananmen vigil trio did not receive fair trial
Hong Kong Free Press

The Hong Kong government has said it will study how to “improve” national security legislation after the city’s top court quashed the convictions of three Tiananmen vigil activists.

The Court of Final Appeal (CFA) on Thursday ruled in favour of Chow Hang-tung, Tang Ngok-kwan, and Tsui Hon-kwong – all from the now-disbanded Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, which organised three decades of vigils commemorating the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown before the event was banned in 2020.
In an e-mailed reply to HKFP on Friday, the government said it has taken note of the apex court’s decision and will study its judgment.
It also said that it “will… examine how the relevant legal system and enforcement mechanisms can be improved in order to be more effective in preventing, suppressing and punishing acts endangering national security.”
The trio were convicted and sentenced to four and a half months in jail in 2023 for failing to comply with a police demand for data under the Beijing-imposed national security law, after authorities alleged that the alliance was a “foreign agent.” They denied the allegation.

The CFA judges unanimously ruled that in redacting key facts from their evidence, the prosecution had “deprived the appellants of a fair trial so that their convictions involved a miscarriage of justice and would in any event not have been permitted to stand.”
The five-judge panel also dismissed the prosecution’s argument that it did not have to prove that the alliance was a foreign agent in court.
“The courts below fell into error in holding that it was sufficient merely for the [police commissioner] to assert that he had reasonable grounds to believe that HKA [Hong Kong Alliance] was a foreign agent,” the ruling said.
Separate to the 2020 Beijing-enacted security law, the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of up to 16 days, and suspects’ access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prison. Article 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city’s opposition-free legislature.
The law has been criticised by rights NGOs, Western states and the UN as vague, broad and “regressive.” Authorities, however, cited perceived foreign interference and a constitutional duty to “close loopholes” after the 2019 protests and unrest.
Support HKFP | Policies & Ethics | Error/typo? | Contact Us | Newsletter | Transparency & Annual Report | Apps
Help safeguard press freedom & keep HKFP free for all readers by supporting our team

font-size: 1.2em;
}
.wp-block-newspack-blocks-homepage-articles .entry-meta {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
align-items: center;
margin-top: 0.5em;
}
.wp-block-newspack-blocks-homepage-articles article .entry-meta {
font-size: 0.8em;
}
.wp-block-newspack-blocks-homepage-articles article .avatar {
height: 25px;
width: 25px;
}
.wp-block-newspack-blocks-homepage-articles .post-thumbnail{
margin: 0;
margin-bottom: 0.25em;
}
.wp-block-newspack-blocks-homepage-articles .post-thumbnail img {
height: auto;
width: 100%;
}
.wp-block-newspack-blocks-homepage-articles .post-thumbnail figcaption {
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
}
.wp-block-newspack-blocks-homepage-articles p {
margin: 0.5em 0;
}