Trump’s attorneys argue for less restrictive rules over evidence in 2020 election case
Fox News
Former President Donald Trump’s attorneys filed court documents on Monday arguing for less restrictions over evidence in the 2020 election case, saying this was a trial about First Amendment rights.
In the court filing, Trump’s legal team said the government requested the Court restrict all documents produced by the government, regardless of sensitivity.
Doing so, the team argued, goes against established law and the former president’s First Amendment rights.
Instead, Trump’s team asked the court to narrow the proposed order to shield “genuinely sensitive materials from public view,” only.
TRUMP PLEADS ‘NOT GUILTY’ TO CHARGES STEMMING FROM SPECIAL COUNSEL’S JAN. 6 PROBE
The team claimed the approach is more consistent with other protective orders entered by the court concerning the events on Jan. 6, 2021, and balances the government’s claim to “protect highly sensitive categories of material” and “expedite the flow of discovery,” the document reads.
TRUMP INDICTED ON CHARGES OUT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL PROBE INTO JAN 6
“In a trial about First Amendment rights, the government seeks to restrict First Amendment rights,” the court filing read. “Worse, it does so against its administration’s primary political opponent, during an election season in which the administration, prominent party members, and media allies have campaigned on the indictment and proliferated its false allegations.”
Trump faces charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights, which stem from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into 2020 election interference and the Capitol Riot on Jan. 6, 2021.
The 2024 GOP front-runner has pleaded not guilty to all the charges.